Structure test planning
Tests can be organized hierarchically, detailed with steps, inputs, expected results, parameters, and configurations, and prepared for different campaigns.
Enterprise application
Test case management and requirement engineering for QA teams.
TestLab supports planning, structuring, executing, and evaluating tests with requirements, test suites, issues, release context, reports, and dashboards.

The core functional areas in a compact overview.
Tests can be organized hierarchically, detailed with steps, inputs, expected results, parameters, and configurations, and prepared for different campaigns.
Test suites, test instances, and test runs support planned manual execution. Results, comments, attachments, and defects remain connected to the concrete test context.
Requirements coverage shows which requirements are covered by tests, which tests remain open, and where QA gaps exist.
Dashboards, reports, and graphs summarize test progress, execution status, defects, and release risks.
Master-detail views, editable tables, lists with rich-text columns, and custom filter queries support different working styles in daily QA work.
User groups, field permissions, state transitions, email notifications, and automatic field updates can be combined for controlled test processes.
Functional and technical aspects that matter in practical use.
TestLab supports hierarchical test planning from high-level structures down to individual test steps. Tests can be described with inputs, expected results, parameters, and configurations, keeping test logic, test data, and execution variants separate.
Test suites group tests for campaigns or releases. Tests can be added directly or through covered requirements, scheduled as ordered test instances, and executed repeatedly while status, results, comments, attachments, and defects remain traceable to the specific execution.
Requirements, tests, issues, and releases can be evaluated together. Reports and dashboards provide a consolidated view of progress, coverage, open defects, and release risks.
Requirements can be structured hierarchically, described with rich text, commented, and enriched with attachments or links. Coverage relationships to tests show which requirements are verified and where gaps remain.
Requirements and issues can be assigned to releases or cycles. Status, priority, and coverage information help teams evaluate maturity and open risks for a planned delivery scope.
Custom table, list, tree, and grid views make larger test and requirement repositories manageable. Filter queries, exports, and personalized dashboards support everyday QA work.
Selected views from the existing product interface.
Scenarios where the product can apply its strengths.
Let us discuss the use case, existing processes, and the right next step.